Battlefield

I must say that I am enjoying Battlefield more and more each day. The only time I get really frustrated is when we are on a team that its only our squad doing missions. Anyone out there that hasnt bought Battlefield, I highly recommend getting it, and I rarely say that since killzone 2.

juice1220 wrote:

I must say that I am enjoying Battlefield more and more each day. The only time I get really frustrated is when we are on a team that its only our squad doing missions. Anyone out there that hasnt bought Battlefield, I highly recommend getting it, and I rarely say that since killzone 2.

I will be getting it eventually like I said before Juice. I'm gonna wait for price to go down first. Just too many games I wanna get and I need to limit myself. I have 2 games pre-ordered(Modnation Racers, Green Day Rock Band) and a few others I really want to get that have been announced for PS3 realease(Killzone 3, Twisted Metal, Star Wars Battlefront, among others). I did like the online demo some even though I died alot(lol). I actually held my own a few times too so I think this game is more suited to my playing style then MW2 multiplayer was.

I absolutley HATE MW2. I was so pissed at that game it actually made me not want to play games at times. I am never going to buy another Modern Warfare game again.

juice1220 wrote:

I absolutley HATE MW2. I was so pissed at that game it actually made me not want to play games at times. I am never going to buy another Modern Warfare game again.

I know how you feel as I was going up against people that had played Call of Duty games for years and Modern Warfare 2 was my first COD game so I was at a real dissadvantage playing online.

It was way too annoying and fast paced for me, I like to take my time and kill people and I the thing I hated the most was that you never knew when you were getting shot til the last second, and you couldnt do anything about it. In both killzone and battlefield you have a chance to escape death.

juice1220 wrote:

It was way too annoying and fast paced for me, I like to take my time and kill people and I the thing I hated the most was that you never knew when you were getting shot til the last second, and you couldnt do anything about it. In both killzone and battlefield you have a chance to escape death.

the thing I hated most was that both teams pretty much looked the same so at times I didn't know if it was an enemy or not. Killzone is alot easier to differentiate between the two

Battlefield is good if u have good squad ..if not its iinda dullk, but contralery to MAG , the Strategy/Killing ratio is way better done, so after KZ2 its the best FPS on my list

its kinda suprising it dont get sold as much as way too over rated MW2

Gilnealis wrote:

Battlefield is good if u have good squad ..if not its iinda dullk, but contralery to MAG , the Strategy/Killing ratio is way better done, so after KZ2 its the best FPS on my list

its kinda suprising it dont get sold as much as way too over rated MW2

I liked the demo and like I told Juice I am getting this, but waiting for price drop. And like both of you I think I was more comfortable playing the Battlefield demo then I was playing MW2 multiplayer.

I agree with Gil, it is my second favorite game after killzone. Although it is losing its glimmer quickly. I cant quite put my finger on y killzone 2 was so much fun for such a long time, but Battlefield gets boring after just a few games. I have yet to play a game where people are into doing the missions as they were in Killzone. In battlefield if the team is good they actually try to disarm, but if its a shitty team no one even looks in its direction. Very frustrating. In killzone for whatever reason people actually did the missions and tried to Win the game.

juice1220 wrote:

I agree with Gil, it is my second favorite game after killzone. Although it is losing its glimmer quickly. I cant quite put my finger on y killzone 2 was so much fun for such a long time, but Battlefield gets boring after just a few games. I have yet to play a game where people are into doing the missions as they were in Killzone. In battlefield if the team is good they actually try to disarm, but if its a shitty team no one even looks in its direction. Very frustrating. In killzone for whatever reason people actually did the missions and tried to Win the game.

The playing field more level in Killzone I think. IMO KZ2 is still the best game I've played on my PS3 and it's because of that level playing field that I love it so much.

What really helped kz2 was the graphics cause who doesn't want to play a game where everything looks so amazing even though your getting killed by me.

jrod7149 wrote:

What really helped kz2 was the graphics cause who doesn't want to play a game where everything looks so amazing even though your getting killed by me.

Funny Jrod!!! But I'm sure you don't only care about kills right? lol

It is a good point that you could always differentiate who was the good guy and who wasnt. If nothing else the hint of blue or red always helped out as well. In my opinion it is still the best game I have played on the playstation, and cant wait to hear more about release date of 3.

juice1220 wrote:

It is a good point that you could always differentiate who was the good guy and who wasnt. If nothing else the hint of blue or red always helped out as well. In my opinion it is still the best game I have played on the playstation, and cant wait to hear more about release date of 3.

yeah, I like that too cause in mw2 everyone looks the same.

You can tell the difference in battlefield between teams alot better than modern warfare.

juice1220 wrote:

You can tell the difference in battlefield between teams alot better than modern warfare.

Yeah, I know. I played the demo. Still not as easy as KZ2 but definately not as bad as MW2